Re-Parented Child Objects Don't Fire Triggers In Parent Record Merges

Today I learned, via the Salesforce forums:

• In Salesforce, if you merge 2 "Contact" records, and if you have a bunch of "child"-table records pointing to the "about-to-be-deleted" Contact record as a foreign key, Salesforce will automatically change the foreign key cross-reference in the "child" records to the ID of the "surviving" Contact record, and it will update those child records' "last modified" timestamp, BUT it will not allow any "UPDATE" triggers from those child tables to fire.
• The only thing you can latch onto to detect that a "Contact merge" has just happened is the "AFTER DELETE" trigger-context against the "Contact" table (you can detect a "deleted but merged" Contact in that context from an ordinary "deleted" Contact because it has a "MasterRecordId" value).
  You can't "detect" that a "child" record has just been "re-parented" in the context of a "merge."
• Annoyingly, once you're that far into the merge ("after contact delete" trigger context), you can no longer tell which "child" records were pointing to the old "parent" because that's long since been "fixed" by Salesforce.
  All you can see is which "child" records are now cross-referencing the surviving "Contact" – which includes all "child" records that were already pointing to the surviving "Contact" in the first place.
• Finally, if you use that knowledge to kick off DML against surviving Contacts' "child" records, you must be careful, because "after Contact delete" is still in the context of the initial Contact merge, and you have to avoid loops (Salesforce will yell at you if you don't).
  If your DML against the "child" records kicks off triggers that result in more DML against one of the very Contacts involved in the merge, you need to make sure you kick off the DML against the "child" records in a "@future" context to force a brand new "execution context" (roughly like a transaction, but a little different in some ways – see Dan Appleman's Advanced Apex book).